FACET Commentary No. 24 – January 2010

It has only been a few years since the Europeans – suffering under what they felt to be the yoke of George Bush – longed for a multipolar world. No one expressed this sentiment more eloquently than former French foreign minister, Dominique de Villepin. He envisioned a world in which the “international community” would direct all of its energy into building “a new world order.” Better than the unipolar order, this “world of cooperation” would help “every nation to mobilize” in the shared interests of all. At the most recent UN Climate Conference, the nature of this new world order became apparent. [READ FULL TEXT]

FACET Commentary No. 23 – December 2009

President Obama’s speech in Copenhagen last Friday included a line that few who had spent the past two weeks listening to bickering negotiators would disagree with: “While the reality of climate change is not in doubt, I have to be honest, I think our ability to take collective action is in doubt right now and it hangs in the balance.” Also hanging in the balance is the habitability of the planet. The Copenhagen conference did not come close to setting the world on a path to stabilizing the climate (…) While it is tempting to respond to the near collapse in Copenhagen with a combination of anger and despair, neither will lead to the result that we and others believe is urgently needed: the transition to a low‐carbon economy in the decades immediately ahead. [READ FULL TEXT]

FACET Commentary No. 22 – October 2009

A recent poll by the popular German youth magazine Bravo (2009) brought to light: Our young people are not politically apathetic. In fact, the opposite is true: They show that they have a much better feeling for the urgency of issues than some wise experts. In a representative poll of more than 1,000 children and teenagers, 89 percent of respondents stated that climate change and environmental pollution pose the most important threat – more important than the financial crisis, violence at school, or terrorism. For today’s youth, the environment is priority number one on the political agenda. [READ FULL TEXT ON  COMMENTARIES PAGE]

FACET Commentary No. 21 – September 2009

The 15th Conference of Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) will be held in less than three months, in mid‐December in Copenhagen, Denmark. With the terms of the Kyoto Protocol set to expire in 2012, the international community declared the 2009 negotiations as the target date for concluding the successor agreement for the 2013 period and beyond. International expectations are high that President Obama will be able to play more of a leadership role on climate than either of his two predecessors. In the lead up to Copenhagen, there have been and will to continue to be a series of bilateral, mini‐lateral, and large multilateral meetings to deal with climate change. Various officials from the Obama administration, from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to U.S. climate envoy Todd Stern to Secretary of Energy Steven Chu, have made numerous trips to China for important bilateral meetings in the hopes of securing a breakthrough before Copenhagen. [MORE]

FACET Commentary No. 20 – September 2009

In just three years, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) has mobilized around 5,000 projects of which over 1,500 have been formally registered with the CDM Executive Board (EB), the regulatory body overseeing its rules. More than 2.7 billion Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) under Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change guidelines are expected to be generated by these projects and over 9 billion Euros have been budgeted for CER acquisition. So far, the CDM has been a pure offset mechanism, where one ton CO2 equivalent reduction from a CDM project in a developing country (as enlisted in Annex A of the Kyoto Protocol) allows to increase emissions in an industrialized country (Annex B) by the same amount of one t. Theoretically, this is no problem as long as the reduction from the CDM project is real and as long as incentives for introduction of emission reduction policies in developing countries are not distorted. [READ MORE]

FACET Commentary No. 19 – August 2009

The European Commission is strongly advocating the establishment of a global emissions trading market through bilateral links between industry emission trading schemes. In January 2009, the Commission unveiled its visions of setting up an OECD-wide carbon market by 2015 latest, and to establish and integrate into this alliance trading systems in major emerging economies, no later than by 2020. What are the Commission’s motives to push for such an ambitious set-up of a global carbon market? In theory, linking carbon markets promises higher liquidity and a larger number of abatement options, thereby increasing economic efficiency. The Commission thus has the vision of a broad, globally linked carbon market as a key instrument in order to achieve the deep cuts in greenhouse gases needed to reach the EU objective of limiting global warming to a 2 degree temperature increase. [MORE]

FACET Commentary No. 16 – July 2009

In December 2007, the 13th conference of the parties (COP) to the United Nations Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) adopted the Bali Road Map, initiating a two-track negotiation process towards a comprehensive post-2012 climate agreement. Besides providing the necessary institutional framework for the discussions on the future shape of the climate regime, one of its major achievements was to clearly indicate COP-15 (which will take place in December 2009 in Copenhagen) as a deadline by when negotiations had to be finalized. 545 days and numerous meetings later, the outcomes of the most recent round of negotiations, held between 1 and 12 June 2009 in Bonn (and referred to as Bonn-2), strongly suggest that negotiators have begun to come under serious pressure to meet this deadline. [MORE]

FACET Commentary No. 17 – July 2009

Let me start with a disclaimer. The slogan Green New Deal is not a Green Party invention. The Green New Deal is not a Green Party pet project, even though we Greens probably are among the most enthusiastic supporters of such a policy. The Green New Deal is a national as well as an international strategy that signals a basic paradigm shift for industrialized and also for developing countries. Green thinking, which has been ridiculed for so long, is going main stream. The narrative not only of progressive politics but the narrative of any political strategy which refuses to allow thedictatorship of the present and the past over the future, will be green. [MORE]

FACET Commentary No. 18 – July 2009

Summer 2009. The June Bonn meeting has finished, the August meeting is still to come. The summer break provides for some time to take stock and look ahead: Where are we now, what might happen in Copenhagen, and what would be needed thereafter? Of course, this article needs a disclaimer. An often‐heard phrase notes that “it is hard to make predictions, in particular when they are about the future…” That also holds for the outcome of the climate negotiations. However, some predictions are not as difficult as they might seem – in spite of the fact that few people yet dare to make them in public. One of them is about the outcome of the Copenhagen negotiations.[MORE]

FACET Commentary No. 15 – Januar 2009

There has been widespread complaining about the tenacious negotiations in Poznań without any results. With the world far from sharing a common vision towards climate protection and negotiations in Copenhagen jeopardized and with them the agreement on mandatory goals regarding emissions reductions after 2012 – whoever had thought that international climate policy would simply continue onwards based on the architecture of the Kyoto Protocol, should think again. The world community certainly made no recognizable step in this direction at the negotiations in Poznań (…) However, even though the results achieved in Poznań appeared to be in between small and negligible, the feeling remains that the majority of the countries that were negotiating have finally recognized the seriousness of the situation. [MORE]